PPN.fm - Photo Podcast Network
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Photography & Gear
  • Sponsor/Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Photography & Gear
  • Sponsor/Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy & Cookies
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

Picture

Let's talk about Gear

Use the right gear for the right purpose...

Picture

Use the Code "PHOTOPODCASTS" for your Luminar Discount Code 


4/24/2017 3 Comments

​Micro Four Thirds camera Gear For Bird/Wildlife Photographers

DISCLAIMER: Crop factor and the associated focal length multiplier only affects field of view. I prefer to reference this as effective focal length but others use FOV. Feel free to use whichever term you like.

I used to primarily rely on Canon or Nikon DSLRs for bird and wildlife photography but my health and my age have made both impractical. Thankfully, Micro Four Third (M43) cameras and lenses have improved over the last five years to the point where they have significantly closed the gap with many DSLRs.

The Micro Four Thirds gear can’t deliver the low-light performance of the DSLRs and it’s a tad bit behind when it comes to autofocus, but there are some obvious benefits too.

The M43 gear is smaller, lighter and less expensive than the full-frame DSLRs. The M43 can match the image quality of the DSLR when there is sufficient light, and can even do a good job of tracking birds in flight. After four months of using M43 gear almost exclusively I am certain that in the right hands, it can hold its own against most DSLRs.

Good technique can yield good results with most cameras but I am particularly impressed with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 MK II camera body. It’s lightweight, powerful and affordable (compared to top-shelf DSLRs) and there is a full lineup of lenses for any task. The Olympus has tracking autofocus that can work and using a mechanical shutter can deliver 18FPS - 60 FPS with an electronic shutter. It has sufficient battery life to capture a full session of photography and the image quality is superb.

The lenses that bird/wildlife photographers crave are available in M43 format. The Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 ASPH. POWER O.I.S. Lens, matched with any M43 camera, gives you a stabilized telephoto lens with a 35mm equivalent focal length of 200-800mm! This lens costs under $1800, has a close focus distance of about 4.5 feet and weighs in at just over two pounds. Imagine a FF lens with those specs. Then imagine a price tag of $15000! You can also imagine a lens that weighs north of 10 pounds and is AT LEAST a couple feet long!

Another great lens for the M43 format is the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO Lens. It’s a $2500, stabilized telephoto lens with an EFL of 600mm at f/4! It also pairs well with an Olympus M.Zuiko Digital MC-14 1.4x Teleconverter to get you an EFL of 840mm in a hand-holdable lens that costs about 1/5th it’s full-frame equal!

Lastly my new favorite lens for birds-in-flight is the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO Lens. This lens is super sharp and lightweight enough to hand-hold all day long. The effective focal length of 80-300 is perfect for many wildlife situations and it's a very fast lens at f/2.8 which means in low-light situations you can still make great images with it.

Being able to hand-hold lenses that allow you to fill the frame with distant subjects is amazing. If you want to use a tripod you can also get by with any old ball head on your tripod. While a gimbal head always helps, (NOTE: I used to use a heavy WImberly Gimbal head and now have switched to a much lighter Jobu Design BWG-J3K Jobu Jr.3 Gimbal Kit with Swing-Arm HM-J2. Since using either of these much lighter lenses don't require as much support, I can use the lighter/less expensive Jobu head.) Another advantage of these lenses is that I can often get by using my Gitzo GM2562T Series 2 Traveler Carbon Fiber Monopod (which weighs less than one pound) with fantastic results.

I have made some great portraits and birdscapes with this gear and even made some salable prints from the RAW files I get from the Olympus. There's no reason to fear the image quality from it and other top-quality M43 cameras like the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5. For some, there is no other option. Many people who love birds and wildlife photography simply can’t carry or effectively wield the large, heavy full-frame gear that most associate with such photography. There are also lots of challenges associated with traveling with long lenses. And let's not forget cost. Some people can’t come up with the $20-$30k that it costs to grab a couple of high end DSLR bodies with telephoto lenses.

If you need to save space, weight or money, and/or want some gear that is easier to travel with yet grabs great images, rest assured that the Micro Four Thirds gear I’ve discussed here will get you some great results. You may have to work a tiny bit harder to get winning shots, but you can absolutely do it. If I can do it – you can too!
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
All images made with Olympus OMD EM1 MK II camera.
3 Comments
Michael Pachis link
6/2/2017 07:34:40

Scott,

Great to see you using the Oly OMD EM1 MkII for bird photography. I would like to see a post detailing the camera tracking settings you have found most effective for capturing birds in flight and any other tips using the OMD system. BTW enjoying the podcast!

Michael

Reply
Philippe Demeur
8/18/2017 04:24:43

Nice article, to the point and full of wisdom. I agree the Panasonic Leica DG 100-400 mm is brilliant both on the GX8 and GH5 for handheld wildlife especially birds in flight. At the weight and size it no issue to carry it in the Scottish Islands for golden eagle and other wildlife. I was also pleasantly surprised by the 2* digital zoom bringing it to a 400-1600 mm equivalent, not perfect but in "emergency" it fulfilled my needs. With the digital zoon I would definitely not shoot handheld below 1/500 and boost my ISO from 125 (my usual) to 320 or higher depending on the circumstances.
I think another great point of the micro 4/3 is to be able to use third party lenses with a simple converter. For landscape and portrait I used a Voigtlander 17.5mm 0.95 and a Soviet-era Jupiter 9 85mm f/2. The latter, inexpensive on eBay, gives a brilliant Bokeh.

For wildlife I also use both on the GH5 and GX8 my 40-year old Canon FD 400mm f4.5, a fantastic lens at 1.2 kg, f. 4.5 is nice to have, especially during winter in Scotland. And with digital zoom 2* I have a 1600 mm f 4.5 that perform amazingly well. Can be used handheld as well in M mode and manual focus, which is no issue for me as I have shot like that for 30 yearsd. For static wildlife pictures, I use again on both camera a Leica R Apo-telyt 280mm f/2.8, most often with the Leica 2x extender giving me a 1120 f/4 lens, and a 2240 f/4 with the digital zoom. Unexpected good results as well for the latter. Tripod required in view of the size and weight of the lens.

Reply
Josh
2/27/2019 17:23:30

I am looking into starting photography. My interests wouls be nature and wildlife. How would the em10 mark 2 do in these regards? I dont want to fork over a tom of cash and not quite enjoy it as much as I think I am going to.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017

    Categories

    All Contests GearGuide More Gear News Podcasts Reviews Tutorial

    RSS Feed

Copyright 2017 - 2021 - All Rights Reserved